1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1998 Toyota Caldina
To start off, 1998 Toyota Caldina is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Caldina (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Caldina weights approximately 188 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1998 Toyota Caldina | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Cimarron | Caldina |
Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |