1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1999 Noble M10
To start off, 1999 Noble M10 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 192 kg more than 1999 Noble M10.
Because 1999 Noble M10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Noble M10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1999 Noble M10 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Noble |
| Model | Cimarron | M10 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
