1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 378 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | Cimarron | Dakota |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |