1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | Cimarron | Forester |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |