1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | Cimarron | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 222 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2550 mm |
