1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2003 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2003 Samsung SM3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2003 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 8 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2003 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Samsung |
Model | Cimarron | SM3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |