1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2004 Marcos TSO
To start off, 2004 Marcos TSO is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Marcos TSO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TSO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2004 Marcos TSO | |
Make | Cadillac | Marcos |
Model | Cimarron | TSO |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 5667 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |