1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 418 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Cimarron | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2964 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |
