1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | Cruze |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2685 mm |