1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Proton Arena
To start off, 2010 Proton Arena is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2010 Proton Arena. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Arena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 117 kg more than 2010 Proton Arena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2010 Proton Arena | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | Cimarron | Arena |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
