1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2011 Volvo S80
To start off, 2011 Volvo S80 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo S80 (217 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S80 weights approximately 607 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2011 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Cimarron | S80 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1759 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1864 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2776 mm |
