1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2029 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3967 mm |
