1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Cadillac | Smart |
Model | Cimarron | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1559 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1867 mm |