1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 230 kg more than 1982 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Cadillac | Humber |
| Model | DeVille | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 4138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3330 mm |
