1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1965 Mini MK I.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1965 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1965 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1965 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | DeVille | MK I |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 846 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2040 mm |
