1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1965 NSU Autonova.
Because 1965 NSU Autonova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU Autonova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1965 NSU Autonova has manual transmission. 1965 NSU Autonova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
Make | Cadillac | NSU |
Model | DeVille | Autonova |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 1085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2260 mm |