1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 926 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Because 1973 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1973 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1973 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | DeVille | 1300 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2430 mm |