1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1974 Skoda S 110 R
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Skoda S 110 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Skoda S 110 R would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1974 Skoda S 110 R.
Because 1974 Skoda S 110 R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Skoda S 110 R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1974 Skoda S 110 R has manual transmission. 1974 Skoda S 110 R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1974 Skoda S 110 R | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | DeVille | S 110 R |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2410 mm |