1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1979 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 40 kg more than 1982 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1979 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1979 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | DeVille | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 5032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3090 mm |
