1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1984 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1984 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 640 kg more than 1984 Holden Commodore.
Because 1984 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1984 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 1984 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 1984 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | Commodore |
Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 3296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |