1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 536 kg more than 2003 Tata E.
Because 2003 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 2003 Tata E has manual transmission. 2003 Tata E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Tata E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Tata |
| Model | DeVille | E |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2810 mm |
