1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Lexus LS
To start off, 2004 Lexus LS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 98 kg more than 2004 Lexus LS.
Because 2004 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Lexus LS | |
Make | Cadillac | Lexus |
Model | DeVille | LS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 278 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2930 mm |