1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 305 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |