1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2010 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | F-150 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3670 mm |