1982 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2011 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 20 kg more than 2011 Aston Martin Virage.
Because 2011 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac DeVille | 2011 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | Cadillac | Aston Martin |
| Model | DeVille | Virage |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 490 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4704 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1288 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2741 mm |
