1982 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 170 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Cadillac Eldorado (257 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1982 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Eldorado | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Eldorado | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4080 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2730 mm |
