1982 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 445 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Cadillac Eldorado (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1982 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Eldorado | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | Eldorado | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2467 mm |
