1982 Cadillac Seville vs. 1966 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Seville is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,079 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Seville | 1966 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Seville | Cortina |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4079 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2500 mm |