1982 Cadillac Seville vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 4,079 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Seville. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Seville. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 130 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Seville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Cadillac Seville. (257 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Cadillac Seville.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Seville | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | Seville | Profile |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4079 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2880 mm |