1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. (44 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. (107 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Camaro | 170 V |
Year Released | 1982 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |