1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1959 Rover P4
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P4 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1959 Rover P4. (67 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1959 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Rover P4. (169 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1959 Rover P4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Camaro | P4 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 52 L |