1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Camaro | Munga |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 31 L |
