1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 NSU Wankel Spider
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 NSU Wankel Spider | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Camaro | Wankel Spider |
Year Released | 1982 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 497 cc |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 34 L |