1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Simca 1100
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1968 Simca 1100. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Simca 1100.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Simca 1100. (91 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Simca 1100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
Model | Camaro | 1100 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |