1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1969 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1969 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | Belmont |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |