1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |