1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK IV. (38 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK IV.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK IV. (72 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1976 Mini MK IV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Camaro | MK IV |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2040 mm |
