1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Camaro | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 99.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 107 L |