1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
Model | Camaro | 280Z |
Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |