1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1980 Seat 127
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 127 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1980 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat 127.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1980 Seat 127 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Camaro | 127 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2230 mm |