1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Honda Ballade
To start off, 1983 Honda Ballade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1983 Honda Ballade. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Honda Ballade.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Honda Ballade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Honda Ballade. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Honda Ballade.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Honda Ballade | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | Ballade |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1335 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2330 mm |