1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1984 Ford Tempo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Tempo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |