1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1986 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1986 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Bluebird. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Bluebird.

Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Bluebird. (124 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 1986 Nissan Bluebird
Make Chevrolet Nissan
Model Camaro Bluebird
Year Released 1982 1986
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4995 cc 1952 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 66 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2560 mm