1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1988 Mazda 323
To start off, 1988 Mazda 323 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1988 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 323 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |