1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1988 Renault 19
To start off, 1988 Renault 19 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1988 Renault 19. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault 19.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault 19. (182 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1988 Renault 19 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | 19 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1236 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |