1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1989 Daihatsu Leeza
To start off, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1989 Daihatsu Leeza | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
| Model | Camaro | Leeza |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 548 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2140 mm |
