1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Chevrolet Oldsmobile
Model Camaro Cutlass
Year Released 1982 1990
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4995 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4930 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2740 mm