1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1991 Holden Barina
To start off, 1991 Holden Barina is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1991 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1991 Holden Barina.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Barina. (105 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1991 Holden Barina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | Barina |
Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2250 mm |