1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1994 Buick Century
To start off, 1994 Buick Century is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1994 Buick Century. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1994 Buick Century.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Buick Century. (180 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Buick Century | |
Make | Chevrolet | Buick |
Model | Camaro | Century |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2664 mm |