1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (181 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Camaro | Tracker |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |